<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Cameron supports bank charges payback campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unfair-bank-charges.org.uk/2009/08/26/david-cameron-supports-bank-charges-payback-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unfair-bank-charges.org.uk/2009/08/26/david-cameron-supports-bank-charges-payback-campaign/</link>
	<description>Solid advice to help reclaim unfair, unethical, illegal bank charges. Take a stance together.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:46:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Stevens</title>
		<link>http://unfair-bank-charges.org.uk/2009/08/26/david-cameron-supports-bank-charges-payback-campaign/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>James Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfair-bank-charges.org.uk/?p=160#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Any refunds should take account of the accumulating nature of the unfair penalties.

For example, it may be decided that instead of a £30 penalty, a reasonable figure might be £5 so that only £25 is refunded. 

However many sunsequent penaties are incurred due to previous unfair penalties pushing you over the limit again - it just snowballs.

So in the example above many of the £5 penalties would still be inappropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any refunds should take account of the accumulating nature of the unfair penalties.</p>
<p>For example, it may be decided that instead of a £30 penalty, a reasonable figure might be £5 so that only £25 is refunded. </p>
<p>However many sunsequent penaties are incurred due to previous unfair penalties pushing you over the limit again &#8211; it just snowballs.</p>
<p>So in the example above many of the £5 penalties would still be inappropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://unfair-bank-charges.org.uk/2009/08/26/david-cameron-supports-bank-charges-payback-campaign/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfair-bank-charges.org.uk/?p=160#comment-244</guid>
		<description>FINALLY.... get someone behind this campaign and make things happen, i&#039;ve been waiting two years and awaiting a payout which could mean i could put down a deposit on my first house!  Alot is depending on the decision made...and i can&#039;t wait!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FINALLY&#8230;. get someone behind this campaign and make things happen, i&#8217;ve been waiting two years and awaiting a payout which could mean i could put down a deposit on my first house!  Alot is depending on the decision made&#8230;and i can&#8217;t wait!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
